Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more economical than heading to court. It lowers dispute, and your family remains in control of plans over children, home and finance.

We work right throughout England and Wales and our family mediation service has more than thirty years’ experience offering specialist, professional family mediation services.

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have several options about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about four broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really complicated, both legally and economically. You can easily make mistakes, and often those errors are irreparable. The only situation I can imagine when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively. I would still highly recommend that each celebration have their own separate attorney evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations come to an arrangement on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to seek advice from with their own, specific lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be much easier on children because the divorce procedures may be more tranquil.
  • Speed up an arrangement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the conciliator is inexperienced or biased towards your other half, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Cause legal complications. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover certain possessions. Since all financial info is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often find out about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an agreement– any contract! Remember, the conciliator can not give any recommendations. All they can do is attempt to get you to agree. Unfortunately, not all arrangements are great arrangements, and in fact, in most cases, no arrangement is much better than a bad arrangement. Unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is usually not a practical alternative for a lot of females.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each employ a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is rather different than in a conventional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your spouse and your respective lawyers all should sign a contract that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your other half must start all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the exact same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure achieves success, you will normally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less costly than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have discovered that the collaborative approach frequently does not work well to settle divorces including complex monetary situations or when there are significant possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include services and professional practices where it is relatively easy to conceal assets and income.

So … as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is prideful, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most common. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “litigated” does not imply the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to common belief, divorce normally does not include 2 individuals equally agreeing to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, considering that both techniques count on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the possibilities are very high that collaboration or mediation might fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most crucial and most hard parts of any divorce are pertaining to an arrangement on child custody, division of assets and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for for how long). Although you want your attorney to be a highly proficient arbitrator, you don’t want someone who is excessively combative, ready to eliminate over anything and whatever. An overly contentious approach will not only extend the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will also be mentally destructive to everyone involved, specifically the children.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would recommend) will always make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only method to deal with these problems.

Up up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge threat for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the threat of litigating is normally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. If you have doubts, it is great to be ready with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links