Mediation helps you make arrangements for children, cash & property and is readily available online

If you face divorce or separation throughout the coronavirus pandemic, Family arbitrators are working online to help you. Family mediation is quicker and less stressful than going to court and is cheaper than being lawfully represented too. You can find a mediator offering an online service

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, and so it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about four broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best advice I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only situation I can visualize when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both celebrations come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still need to seek advice from with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to consider prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids considering that the divorce procedures might be more tranquil.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and money. If settlements stop working, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the conciliator is inexperienced or biased towards your partner, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal issues. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain assets. Considering that all monetary details is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative behavior of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any contract! Unless both parties can be fairly affordable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a practical alternative for a lot of females.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce takes place when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your other half will each work with a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular lawyers all need to sign a contract that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must begin all over again and discover new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collective procedure achieves success, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than traditional litigation if the collective procedure works.

However, I have discovered that the collective method frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complex financial situations or when there are significant possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Frequently the other half controls the “bag strings,” and the other half is typically unaware of the details of their financial scenario. When this type of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to conceal properties. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include organizations and professional practices where it is relatively simple to conceal possessions and income. Additionally, the problem of assessment can be rather controversial.

… as a general rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your husband is hiding assets/income.
  • Your spouse is domineering, and you have difficulty speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most common. These days, most of divorcing couples pick the “conventional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, though, “litigated” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. The large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial scenario right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, considering that both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged scenario, the possibilities are really high that cooperation or mediation might stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might fail, wasting your money and time?

The most crucial and most tough parts of any divorce are concerning a contract on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely skilled negotiator, you don’t desire somebody who is overly combative, ready to fight over anything and everything. An extremely contentious technique will not only extend the discomfort and substantially increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everyone included, particularly the kids.

Remember: Many divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will constantly strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. If they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these problems.

Up till that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some sensible resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And don’t forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge threat for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the threat of going to court is typically such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Certainly, if you are able to work with your partner to make decisions and both of you are truthful and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. However, if you have doubts, it is great to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links