Mediation helps you make plans for children, cash & home and is offered online

If you face divorce or separation during the coronavirus pandemic, Family conciliators are working online to help you. Family mediation is quicker and less difficult than litigating and is less expensive than being legally represented too. You can find a conciliator offering an online service

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s considering divorce, you have several choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to think about 4 broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both legally and economically. You can quickly make mistakes, and often those mistakes are permanent. The only circumstance I can visualize when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply. I would still extremely advise that each party have their own different attorney review the last documents.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who helps both celebrations come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few pros and cons to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be much easier on children given that the divorce procedures might be more serene.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one partner. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your husband, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or improperly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal problems. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal particular assets. Since all financial information is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might potentially hide assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any contract! Unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a feasible choice for most females.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple accepts exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collective divorce both you and your partner will each hire an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather different than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your partner and your respective attorneys all should sign an agreement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your spouse must start all over again and find new lawyers. Neither celebration can utilize the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collective procedure is successful, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less costly than standard litigation if the collective process works.

Though, I have discovered that the collaborative technique frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary scenarios or when there are considerable possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (earnings, assets and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. Typically the other half manages the “handbag strings,” and the wife is typically uninformed of the details of their monetary situation. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to hide assets. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve companies and expert practices where it is relatively simple to conceal properties and earnings. In addition, the problem of valuation can be rather contentious.

So … as a general rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your hubby is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is prideful, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “traditional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “litigated” does not mean the divorce ends up in court. The huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to popular belief, divorce generally does not involve 2 individuals mutually accepting end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial scenario right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, given that both approaches depend on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged circumstance, the opportunities are very high that collaboration or mediation may fail. Why take the threat of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most important and most tough parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, division of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). You want your lawyer to be a highly proficient mediator, you don’t desire someone who is extremely combative, prepared to combat over anything and everything. An extremely controversial approach will not just lengthen the pain and considerably increase your legal fees, it will also be emotionally harmful to everybody included, especially the children.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will constantly make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t pertain to an affordable settlement or if the other party is entirely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to resolve these issues.

Up up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. When in court, the role of each attorney modifications.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the hazard of going to court is typically such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is good to be all set with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links