Family mediation

During mediation an independent, expertly qualified arbitrator assists you and your ex-partner exercise an agreement about issues such as:

plans for children after you break up (sometimes called house or contact);.

  • kid maintenance payments.
  • financial resources (for example, what to do with your house, cost savings, pension, debts)

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s pondering divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you require to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can imagine when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just 2 or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce might be accomplished quite quickly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to think about prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids because the divorce procedures may be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may likewise:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your partner, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable agreement. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal complications. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal particular possessions. Given that all monetary details is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your husband could possibly hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often become aware of the wonders of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less controversial, more economical and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Keep in mind, the conciliator can not provide any guidance. All they can do is attempt to get you to concur. Sadly, not all contracts are good arrangements, and in fact, in most cases, no contract is better than a bad agreement. So unless both parties can be fairly sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is normally not a practical option for the majority of women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your partner will each hire an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite various than in a conventional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your husband and your particular attorneys all need to sign an agreement that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your other half need to begin all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can use the very same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less pricey than traditional lawsuits if the collective procedure works.

Sadly, though, I have actually found that the collective technique frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated monetary scenarios or when there are substantial properties. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial information (income, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Frequently the husband manages the “bag strings,” and the wife is usually unaware of the information of their monetary circumstance. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the other half to conceal possessions. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces involve businesses and expert practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal possessions and income. In addition, the problem of valuation can be rather controversial.

… as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your spouse is hiding assets/income.
  • Your other half is domineering, and you have difficulty speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most typical. These days, most of divorcing couples choose the “conventional” design of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. The large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Because contrary to common belief, divorce usually does not involve 2 individuals equally consenting to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both techniques depend on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the possibilities are extremely high that partnership or mediation might fail. Why take the threat of going those routes when chances are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most crucial and most hard parts of any divorce are coming to a contract on kid custody, department of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your attorney to be an extremely proficient arbitrator, you don’t want someone who is overly combative, all set to eliminate over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial approach will not only lengthen the pain and significantly increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally damaging to everybody involved, particularly the children.

Keep in mind: Many divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to resolve these problems.

Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes.

And don’t forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both parties to take– which’s also why the threat of going to court is usually such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce options carefully. If you have doubts, it is great to be all set with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links