Solent Family Mediation assist households in conflict, especially those divorcing or separating. Whatever the problems, our know-how will help you settle them

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the benefits and drawbacks of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only situation I can picture when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple deals with a neutral conciliator who helps both parties concern an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. The mediator might or might not be a legal representative, but he/she should be extremely skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is vital for the arbitrator to be neutral and not promote for either party. Both celebrations still need to speak with their own, private lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to think about prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids because the divorce procedures might be more tranquil.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the mediator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your hubby, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable agreement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal issues. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Considering that all financial information is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, more economical and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Remember, the conciliator can not offer any guidance. All they can do is attempt to get you to agree. Sadly, not all contracts are excellent arrangements, and in fact, in a lot of cases, no contract is much better than a bad arrangement. So unless both parties can be fairly reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is typically not a practical alternative for the majority of females.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each employ an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather different than in a traditional divorce. Each lawyer encourages and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet with your lawyer independently and you and your lawyer will likewise meet your spouse and his lawyer. The collaborative process may also involve other neutral professionals such as a divorce financial planner who will assist both of you work through your monetary concerns and a coach or therapist who can help direct both of you through kid custody and other emotionally charged issues.

In the collaborative process, you, your spouse and your respective lawyers all must sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your spouse need to begin all over once again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the same attorneys once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure succeeds, you will usually need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. But the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than traditional litigation if the collective procedure works.

Though, I have discovered that the collective method typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated monetary scenarios or when there are significant properties. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (income, assets and liabilities) is revealed voluntarily. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces involve businesses and expert practices where it is fairly simple to hide properties and earnings.

… as a basic rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your partner is hiding assets/income.
  • Your hubby is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of separating couples select the “standard” model of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a suit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, considering that both techniques rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the opportunities are extremely high that cooperation or mediation may fail. Why take the danger of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most essential and most hard parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on kid custody, division of assets and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your attorney to be an extremely knowledgeable arbitrator, you do not desire somebody who is extremely combative, all set to fight over anything and whatever. An excessively contentious approach will not just extend the discomfort and significantly increase your legal charges, it will also be emotionally harmful to everyone involved, particularly the kids.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would recommend) will constantly make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. But if they can’t concern a sensible settlement or if the other party is entirely unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to solve these issues.

If you have attempted whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and concern some sensible resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney modifications. Settlements and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their new job is to “win” and get the best possible result for their client.

And do not forget, once you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– which’s likewise why the danger of litigating is usually such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is good to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links