FINANCIAL RESOURCES. FAMILY. FUTURE.

Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, specifically those separating or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more affordable than heading to court. It minimizes dispute, and your household stays in control of plans over kids, property and financing.

We work right across England and Wales and our family mediation service has over 30 years’ experience providing expert, expert family mediation services.

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best suggestions I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can picture when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce might be achieved quite quickly and cheaply.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both parties concern a contract on all elements of their divorce. The mediator might or may not be a lawyer, but he/she should be extremely well-versed in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the conciliator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both parties still need to consult with their own, private lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of pros and cons to think about prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids given that the divorce procedures may be more peaceful.
  • Speed up an arrangement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the conciliator is unskilled or biased towards your other half, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or poorly drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover particular properties. Given that all financial information is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often find out about the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest problem with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Remember, the mediator can not provide any suggestions. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Not all contracts are excellent contracts, and in reality, in many cases, no agreement is much better than a bad arrangement. So unless both celebrations can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a practical alternative for most females.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collective divorce both you and your spouse will each hire an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is rather different than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative process, you, your spouse and your particular lawyers all should sign a contract that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your hubby must start all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the very same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process achieves success, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. But the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than standard litigation if the collective procedure works.

Sadly, however, I have found that the collaborative method often doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex monetary situations or when there are substantial possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Often the husband manages the “purse strings,” and the other half is typically unaware of the information of their monetary circumstance. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the partner to hide properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include businesses and expert practices where it is reasonably simple to conceal assets and earnings. Additionally, the problem of assessment can be rather controversial.

So … as a basic rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your husband is hiding assets/income.
  • Your husband is domineering, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most common. These days, most of divorcing couples select the “standard” model of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. The huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Because contrary to common belief, divorce usually does not involve 2 people equally consenting to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial circumstance right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the opportunities are very high that cooperation or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, wasting your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are coming to a contract on kid custody, division of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for for how long). You want your lawyer to be a highly competent negotiator, you do not want someone who is overly combative, all set to fight over anything and whatever. An overly contentious approach will not just prolong the pain and considerably increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally detrimental to everybody involved, particularly the children.

Keep in mind: The majority of divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would recommend) will always make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. However if they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these problems.

If you have tried everything else, and you do wind up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and concern some sensible resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their client.

And don’t forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the risk of going to court is usually such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Certainly, if you are able to work with your husband to make decisions and both of you are honest and affordable, then mediation or the collective technique might be best. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links