Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating. Whatever the problems, our proficiency will assist you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, therefore it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of options about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to consider four broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really made complex, both legally and financially. You can quickly make errors, and frequently those mistakes are irreversible. The only situation I can envision when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just 2 or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply. I would still highly suggest that each celebration have their own separate lawyer evaluation the final documents.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a separating couple deals with a neutral arbitrator who helps both parties come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. The arbitrator might or might not be a lawyer, but he/she should be extremely skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the conciliator to be neutral and not advocate for either celebration. Both parties still require to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids since the divorce proceedings might be more serene.
  • Speed up an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and money. If settlements stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the conciliator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your partner, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation contract that’s uneven or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal complications. Any problem of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain properties. Since all monetary information is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your partner could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less contentious, less pricey and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is generally not a viable choice for the majority of women.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collective divorce happens when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your other half will each work with a lawyer who has been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is quite various than in a standard divorce. Each attorney recommends and helps their customer in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet your lawyer separately and you and your lawyer will also consult with your hubby and his attorney. The collective process may also involve other neutral experts such as a divorce financial coordinator who will help both of you overcome your financial problems and a coach or therapist who can assist guide both of you through kid custody and other emotionally charged concerns.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular attorneys all need to sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your spouse must start all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collective process achieves success, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less pricey than standard litigation if the collective process works.

However, I have discovered that the collaborative technique typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated monetary circumstances or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary info (income, assets and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include organizations and professional practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal assets and earnings.

So … as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your husband is prideful, and you have trouble speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most common. Nowadays, most of divorcing couples choose the “conventional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, however, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. The huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged scenario, the chances are really high that collaboration or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most essential and most tough parts of any divorce are coming to a contract on child custody, division of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). Although you want your attorney to be a highly knowledgeable mediator, you don’t want someone who is excessively combative, prepared to combat over anything and whatever. An overly controversial approach will not just extend the pain and considerably increase your legal charges, it will likewise be mentally detrimental to everyone included, specifically the children.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would recommend) will constantly strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to deal with these concerns.

If you have actually tried whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up till that point both attorneys were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the role of each attorney changes. Settlements and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their brand-new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And do not forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– and that’s also why the hazard of going to court is usually such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Undoubtedly, if you are able to deal with your partner to make decisions and both of you are honest and reasonable, then mediation or the collective technique may be best. But, if you have doubts, it is great to be ready with “Fallback” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links