Solent Family Mediation assist households in conflict, especially those separating or separating. Whatever the problems, our knowledge will help you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s pondering divorce, you have several options about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really made complex, both legally and economically. You can easily make mistakes, and often those errors are irreversible. The only situation I can imagine when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and inexpensively. I would still extremely advise that each party have their own separate lawyer evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. Both parties still require to seek advice from with their own, individual attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a few pros and cons to consider prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be easier on kids since the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Waste time and cash. If settlements stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the conciliator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your spouse, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or badly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover specific assets. Given that all financial information is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often find out about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My biggest problem with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the conciliator is to get the parties to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Remember, the conciliator can not offer any recommendations. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Not all agreements are great agreements, and in reality, in lots of cases, no agreement is much better than a bad agreement. So unless both celebrations can be fairly affordable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a viable choice for a lot of ladies.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your husband will each employ an attorney who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite various than in a conventional divorce.

In the collective process, you, your other half and your particular attorneys all need to sign an agreement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your other half must start all over once again and discover brand-new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure achieves success, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and more economical than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative process works.

Though, I have actually found that the collaborative technique frequently does not work well to settle divorces including complex monetary circumstances or when there are significant possessions. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary information (income, properties and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces involve companies and expert practices where it is fairly easy to conceal assets and income.

… as a basic rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your husband is aggressive, and you have difficulty speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most common. Nowadays, most of divorcing couples select the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, since both methods rely on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the opportunities are really high that partnership or mediation might fail. Why take the threat of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for for how long). Although you desire your attorney to be a highly proficient arbitrator, you don’t want somebody who is excessively combative, all set to eliminate over anything and everything. An overly controversial method will not just prolong the discomfort and substantially increase your legal charges, it will also be mentally detrimental to everybody involved, specifically the kids.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would advise) will constantly strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to deal with these issues.

If you have actually tried everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and pertain to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer modifications. Settlements and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their client.

And don’t forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the hazard of litigating is usually such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Certainly, if you have the ability to deal with your other half to make decisions and both of you are truthful and sensible, then mediation or the collective technique might be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links