Solent Family Mediation assist households in conflict, specifically those separating or separating. Whatever the problems, our competence will help you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s pondering divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider four broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can visualize when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be accomplished rather quickly and inexpensively.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who helps both celebrations come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to seek advice from with their own, individual attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on children because the divorce procedures may be more serene.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one partner. If the conciliator is inexperienced or biased towards your other half, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation contract that’s uneven or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any problem of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain properties. Given that all financial info is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy behavior patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less controversial, more economical and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. Nevertheless, my most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Remember, the arbitrator can not offer any recommendations. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Sadly, not all contracts are excellent agreements, and in fact, in most cases, no agreement is much better than a bad arrangement. Unless both parties can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a practical option for most women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce happens when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your spouse will each employ an attorney who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The function of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is quite different than in a conventional divorce.

In the collective process, you, your other half and your respective attorneys all should sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your hubby need to begin all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process is successful, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative process works.

Unfortunately, however, I have actually discovered that the collaborative technique frequently does not work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary circumstances or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary info (income, assets and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Typically the partner controls the “purse strings,” and the partner is usually uninformed of the details of their financial scenario. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the partner to hide properties. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces involve businesses and professional practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal possessions and income. Furthermore, the problem of evaluation can be rather contentious.

… as a general rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first three alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your spouse is hiding assets/income.
  • Your other half is domineering, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of separating couples select the “traditional” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “litigated” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. The vast bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the possibilities are extremely high that collaboration or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, wasting your time and money?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are coming to an arrangement on kid custody, department of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for for how long). You want your attorney to be an extremely knowledgeable arbitrator, you don’t desire someone who is overly combative, prepared to combat over anything and everything. An overly contentious technique will not only prolong the pain and substantially increase your legal charges, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everyone involved, specifically the kids.

Keep in mind: Many divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would suggest) will constantly strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these issues.

If you have attempted whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up until that point both attorneys were “mediators,” attempting to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the very best possible result for their customer.

And do not forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both celebrations to take– which’s likewise why the hazard of litigating is usually such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Certainly, if you have the ability to deal with your other half to make decisions and both of you are truthful and affordable, then mediation or the collective technique may be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links