Family mediation

During mediation an independent, expertly skilled mediator helps you and your ex-partner exercise an agreement about issues such as:

plans for children after you separate (in some cases called residence or contact);.

  • child maintenance payments.
  • finances (for example, what to do with your home, cost savings, pension, debts)

Arrange a Call Back

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of choices about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider four broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very made complex, both lawfully and economically. You can easily make errors, and typically those mistakes are permanent. The only situation I can visualize when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite quickly and cheaply. I would still highly advise that each party have their own different attorney evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. The arbitrator might or may not be an attorney, but he/she should be incredibly skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is vital for the mediator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, individual attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids since the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Speed up an arrangement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your hubby, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal issues. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain properties. Considering that all financial information is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less contentious, more economical and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any agreement! Keep in mind, the conciliator can not give any suggestions. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Not all agreements are good arrangements, and in reality, in many cases, no contract is much better than a bad contract. Unless both parties can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is normally not a practical choice for many ladies.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collective divorce happens when a couple accepts exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your spouse will each employ a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite different than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your other half and your particular lawyers all must sign an arrangement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your hubby should begin all over once again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither party can use the very same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. However the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than standard lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have found that the collective approach frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated monetary scenarios or when there are substantial possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (income, properties and liabilities) is divulged willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include companies and professional practices where it is fairly simple to hide possessions and income.

… as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your spouse is prideful, and you have difficulty speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most common. Nowadays, most of separating couples select the “conventional” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, though, “litigated” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the possibilities are extremely high that cooperation or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, wasting your time and money?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on child custody, department of possessions and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your attorney to be a highly experienced negotiator, you don’t want somebody who is extremely combative, prepared to eliminate over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial method will not only extend the pain and considerably increase your legal charges, it will also be mentally damaging to everyone included, specifically the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to resolve these concerns.

If you have actually attempted everything else, and you do wind up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and pertain to some reasonable resolution. As soon as in court, the function of each lawyer changes. Negotiations and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– and that’s also why the hazard of going to court is typically such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Clearly, if you have the ability to deal with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are truthful and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative approach may be best. But, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links