Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, especially those separating or separating. Whatever the issues, our proficiency will assist you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s pondering divorce, you have a number of options about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both lawfully and financially. You can quickly make mistakes, and typically those mistakes are permanent. The only situation I can imagine when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite quickly and cheaply. Nevertheless, I would still extremely advise that each party have their own separate lawyer review the last files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both parties come to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, private lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on children because the divorce procedures might be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the mediator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your hubby, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain possessions. Since all financial details is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might potentially hide assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently become aware of the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less contentious, cheaper and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. However, my greatest problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Keep in mind, the conciliator can not give any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Not all agreements are excellent agreements, and in truth, in lots of cases, no contract is better than a bad arrangement. So unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is normally not a viable option for most women.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collective divorce both you and your spouse will each work with an attorney who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite different than in a conventional divorce. Each lawyer advises and helps their client in negotiating a settlement agreement. You will meet with your attorney independently and you and your attorney will also meet your partner and his attorney. The collective process may likewise include other neutral professionals such as a divorce financial organizer who will help both of you resolve your monetary problems and a coach or therapist who can help direct both of you through child custody and other emotionally charged problems.

In the collective procedure, you, your other half and your particular lawyers all need to sign an arrangement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must start all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither party can use the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective procedure is successful, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than conventional litigation if the collective procedure works.

Though, I have actually found that the collaborative technique typically does not work well to settle divorces including complicated monetary scenarios or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Often the other half controls the “purse strings,” and the partner is generally uninformed of the information of their financial circumstance. When this type of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to hide properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include services and professional practices where it is fairly simple to conceal possessions and earnings. Furthermore, the concern of valuation can be rather controversial.

So … as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your other half is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is imperious, and you have trouble speaking out or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “traditional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce winds up in court. The huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a lawsuit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Because contrary to common belief, divorce generally does not involve 2 individuals equally consenting to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged scenario, the opportunities are really high that cooperation or mediation might fail. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most essential and most tough parts of any divorce are concerning an agreement on child custody, division of possessions and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for for how long). Although you want your attorney to be an extremely proficient arbitrator, you don’t desire someone who is excessively combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An extremely contentious technique will not only prolong the pain and substantially increase your legal charges, it will also be emotionally damaging to everyone involved, especially the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would advise) will constantly make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. But if they can’t concern an affordable settlement or if the other party is totally unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to solve these issues.

If you have attempted whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up till that point both attorneys were “mediators,” trying to get the parties to jeopardize and pertain to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer changes. Negotiations and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their new job is to “win” and get the very best possible result for their customer.

And do not forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the risk of litigating is typically such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links