If you are at the point of separation, or you are currently separated or divorced, mediation might assist you focus on the future.

Arrange a Call Back

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really made complex, both legally and financially. You can quickly make errors, and frequently those mistakes are permanent. The only scenario I can visualize when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished quite quickly and cheaply. I would still extremely advise that each party have their own separate attorney review the last files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who helps both celebrations come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. The arbitrator might or might not be a lawyer, but he/she should be incredibly skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the mediator to be neutral and not advocate for either celebration. Both celebrations still require to seek advice from their own, individual attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on children given that the divorce procedures might be more peaceful.
  • Expedite an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Waste time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the mediator is unskilled or biased towards your hubby, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or improperly prepared can be challenged.
  • Cause legal issues. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Because all monetary details is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less controversial, more economical and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. However, my most significant problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any contract! Remember, the conciliator can not provide any recommendations. All they can do is attempt to get you to concur. Regrettably, not all agreements are good arrangements, and in fact, in most cases, no agreement is better than a bad arrangement. So unless both celebrations can be relatively sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a viable alternative for the majority of ladies.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce happens when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your partner will each hire a lawyer who has been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The function of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite various than in a traditional divorce. Each lawyer encourages and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet your lawyer independently and you and your attorney will likewise meet with your husband and his lawyer. The collective procedure may also involve other neutral specialists such as a divorce financial coordinator who will assist both of you overcome your financial concerns and a coach or therapist who can help guide both of you through kid custody and other mentally charged concerns.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular lawyers all should sign a contract that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your husband need to start all over again and find new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the exact same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process is successful, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less pricey than traditional litigation if the collaborative process works.

However, I have actually discovered that the collaborative method frequently does not work well to settle divorces including complex financial circumstances or when there are significant possessions. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve companies and expert practices where it is relatively easy to hide possessions and income.

… as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your other half is hiding assets/income.
  • Your other half is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “traditional” model of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both techniques rely on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged situation, the chances are very high that cooperation or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are concerning an agreement on kid custody, division of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). You desire your lawyer to be a highly knowledgeable mediator, you do not want someone who is excessively combative, ready to battle over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial method will not just prolong the pain and substantially increase your legal fees, it will also be mentally destructive to everybody involved, specifically the children.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will constantly strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only method to resolve these concerns.

If you have tried whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and pertain to some reasonable resolution. But once in court, the role of each lawyer modifications. Settlements and compromise move to the back burner. Their new job is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge threat for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the danger of going to court is usually such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links