How do you win a mediation case?

Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, especially those separating or separating. Whatever the issues, our proficiency will assist you settle them

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s considering divorce, you have several alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best guidance I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very complicated, both lawfully and financially. You can quickly make mistakes, and typically those errors are irreparable. The only situation I can imagine when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply. I would still highly advise that each party have their own different lawyer evaluation the last documents.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both parties come to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. Both parties still require to consult with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids since the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce since you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and cash. If settlements stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the conciliator is unskilled or biased towards your spouse, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular properties. Since all financial info is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your husband might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase negative behavior of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the mediator is to get the parties to come to a contract– any contract! Remember, the arbitrator can not give any advice. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Sadly, not all agreements are great contracts, and in fact, in a lot of cases, no contract is better than a bad arrangement. Unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is normally not a viable alternative for the majority of women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your hubby will each hire a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your partner and your respective lawyers all should sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your spouse need to begin all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither celebration can utilize the exact same lawyers again!

Even if the collective procedure succeeds, you will typically have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less pricey than traditional litigation if the collaborative procedure works.

Unfortunately, however, I have actually found that the collaborative technique frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated financial circumstances or when there are substantial properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial information (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. Frequently the hubby controls the “purse strings,” and the partner is generally uninformed of the details of their monetary situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the spouse to conceal properties. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve companies and expert practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal properties and earnings. Additionally, the problem of evaluation can be quite controversial.

So … as a basic rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your partner is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is prideful, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples select the “traditional” model of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “litigated” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial scenario right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged situation, the possibilities are extremely high that collaboration or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are concerning an agreement on child custody, division of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). You desire your lawyer to be a highly competent mediator, you do not want someone who is overly combative, ready to fight over anything and everything. An excessively contentious approach will not only extend the pain and significantly increase your legal costs, it will likewise be emotionally destructive to everyone included, especially the kids.

Remember: Most divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would suggest) will always strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to fix these concerns.

Up up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. When in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both celebrations to take– and that’s also why the danger of going to court is generally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links