Mediation helps you make arrangements for kids, money & home and is readily available online

If you face divorce or separation during the coronavirus pandemic, Household mediators are working online to assist you. Family mediation is quicker and less difficult than going to court and is less expensive than being legally represented too. You can discover an arbitrator providing an online service

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can visualize when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be achieved quite rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still need to seek advice from with their own, individual attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids since the divorce procedures might be more serene.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might likewise:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the conciliator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your other half, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific assets. Given that all monetary information is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse might possibly hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the conciliator is to get the parties to come to a contract– any arrangement! Unless both celebrations can be relatively sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a practical alternative for many females.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple accepts exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your hubby will each employ a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite various than in a traditional divorce. Each attorney encourages and assists their client in working out a settlement arrangement. You will meet your lawyer separately and you and your attorney will also consult with your partner and his attorney. The collective process might also involve other neutral specialists such as a divorce financial planner who will help both of you overcome your financial problems and a coach or therapist who can assist assist both of you through kid custody and other emotionally charged concerns.

In the collaborative process, you, your hubby and your respective lawyers all should sign an arrangement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your hubby must start all over once again and find brand-new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than standard litigation if the collaborative process works.

However, I have found that the collective technique typically does not work well to settle divorces including complicated financial circumstances or when there are significant assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (earnings, assets and liabilities) is revealed willingly. Often the spouse manages the “handbag strings,” and the better half is generally unaware of the details of their monetary situation. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the other half to hide properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include companies and professional practices where it is fairly easy to conceal assets and income. In addition, the issue of appraisal can be rather contentious.

So … as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your other half is hiding assets/income.
  • Your spouse is imperious, and you have difficulty speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “conventional” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “litigated” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. The vast bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Since contrary to popular belief, divorce usually does not involve 2 people equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the opportunities are really high that collaboration or mediation might fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to an arrangement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for how long). Although you desire your lawyer to be an extremely experienced arbitrator, you don’t want somebody who is extremely combative, prepared to fight over anything and everything. An extremely contentious approach will not only prolong the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally detrimental to everyone included, particularly the kids.

Remember: The majority of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will constantly make every effort to come to an affordable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t concern a sensible settlement or if the other party is entirely unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to solve these issues.

Up up until that point both lawyers were “arbitrators,” trying to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some reasonable resolution. When in court, the function of each attorney changes.

And don’t forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the hazard of going to court is generally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Certainly, if you have the ability to work with your other half to make decisions and both of you are truthful and sensible, then mediation or the collective approach might be best. However, if you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Fallback” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links