If you are at the point of separation, or you are already separated or divorced, mediation may help you concentrate on the future.

Arrange a Call Back

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have a number of choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to consider 4 broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very made complex, both legally and financially. You can easily make errors, and frequently those mistakes are irreparable. The only situation I can picture when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and inexpensively. I would still highly advise that each party have their own different attorney review the last documents.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still need to consult with their own, private lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids given that the divorce procedures may be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Lose time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your spouse, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s uneven or poorly drafted can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific properties. Because all monetary information is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. However, my biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the conciliator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Remember, the arbitrator can not provide any advice. All they can do is attempt to get you to agree. Unfortunately, not all contracts are great arrangements, and in fact, in most cases, no agreement is much better than a bad contract. So unless both celebrations can be fairly sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is generally not a viable alternative for most ladies.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce takes place when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your spouse will each employ an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is quite different than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your other half and your particular attorneys all should sign an arrangement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your hubby should begin all over once again and discover new attorneys. Neither party can use the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure is successful, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

Regrettably, however, I have discovered that the collective technique typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated monetary circumstances or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (income, properties and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. Often the partner controls the “handbag strings,” and the better half is typically uninformed of the details of their monetary scenario. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the partner to conceal possessions. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include businesses and professional practices where it is relatively simple to conceal properties and income. In addition, the issue of valuation can be quite controversial.

So … as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these first three alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your spouse is domineering, and you have difficulty speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most typical. These days, most of separating couples pick the “traditional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “litigated” does not imply the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to popular belief, divorce usually does not include two people equally agreeing to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial circumstance right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial details.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the chances are really high that partnership or mediation may fail. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might fail, wasting your money and time?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to an agreement on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your lawyer to be a highly competent arbitrator, you don’t want someone who is overly combative, ready to fight over anything and everything. An overly controversial approach will not only lengthen the pain and considerably increase your legal costs, it will also be mentally destructive to everyone involved, specifically the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will always make every effort to come to an affordable settlement with the other party. But if they can’t pertain to a sensible settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to solve these concerns.

If you have actually tried whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and concern some affordable resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes. Settlements and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their client.

And don’t forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the danger of litigating is generally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce options carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Certainly, if you are able to deal with your partner to make decisions and both of you are honest and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative technique might be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links