Solent Family Mediation assist families in conflict, particularly those separating or separating. Whatever the problems, our knowledge will help you settle them

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s considering divorce, you have numerous options about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to consider four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best suggestions I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely complicated, both legally and economically. You can easily make mistakes, and frequently those mistakes are irreparable. The only scenario I can visualize when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished rather quickly and inexpensively. I would still extremely recommend that each celebration have their own separate lawyer evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral conciliator who helps both celebrations concern an agreement on all elements of their divorce. The arbitrator might or may not be an attorney, however he/she should be extremely skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the mediator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, specific attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on children given that the divorce procedures might be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your other half, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover particular possessions. Because all financial information is voluntarily disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Unless both parties can be relatively sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a practical alternative for a lot of females.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce happens when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collective divorce both you and your spouse will each hire a lawyer who has been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your spouse and your particular lawyers all should sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your other half need to start all over again and discover new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative process succeeds, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less pricey than conventional litigation if the collaborative process works.

Though, I have discovered that the collective approach typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial situations or when there are substantial properties. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all financial info (income, assets and liabilities) is divulged willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include organizations and professional practices where it is relatively simple to conceal possessions and income.

So … as a general rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is domineering, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most typical. Nowadays, most of divorcing couples select the “conventional” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a lawsuit.’

Why are claims a part of divorce? Since contrary to popular belief, divorce usually does not include 2 individuals equally consenting to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly mentally charged circumstance, the chances are very high that collaboration or mediation may fail. Why take the threat of going those paths when odds are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are coming to an agreement on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for how long). You desire your lawyer to be a highly experienced mediator, you don’t desire someone who is extremely combative, all set to fight over anything and everything. An overly controversial approach will not only prolong the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally detrimental to everyone included, particularly the kids.

Remember: The majority of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. However if they can’t concern a reasonable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these concerns.

If you have attempted whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” trying to get the celebrations to jeopardize and concern some reasonable resolution. But once in court, the function of each lawyer modifications. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their new job is to “win” and get the best possible result for their customer.

And do not forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big danger for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the risk of going to court is normally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Undoubtedly, if you have the ability to work with your husband to make decisions and both of you are honest and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative approach might be best. However, if you have doubts, it is good to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links