If you are at the point of separation, or you are already separated or divorced, mediation may help you concentrate on the future.

Arrange a Call Back

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous choices about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about four broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can envision when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be achieved quite quickly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to an arrangement on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be easier on children since the divorce procedures may be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or biased towards your spouse, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal complications. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Since all financial info is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative behavior of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any agreement! Keep in mind, the mediator can not offer any advice. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Not all agreements are good arrangements, and in reality, in lots of cases, no agreement is much better than a bad contract. Unless both celebrations can be fairly reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is usually not a viable alternative for a lot of women.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce happens when a couple accepts exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your husband will each work with an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is quite various than in a traditional divorce. Each lawyer recommends and assists their client in negotiating a settlement contract. You will consult with your lawyer independently and you and your attorney will also meet with your partner and his attorney. The collaborative procedure may also include other neutral professionals such as a divorce financial organizer who will help both of you work through your financial problems and a coach or therapist who can assist direct both of you through kid custody and other mentally charged issues.

In the collaborative process, you, your spouse and your respective attorneys all must sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must start all over once again and discover new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the very same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process achieves success, you will usually need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. However the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than traditional lawsuits if the collective process works.

Sadly, however, I have actually found that the collaborative method often doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial circumstances or when there are substantial assets. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged willingly. Frequently the husband manages the “bag strings,” and the wife is typically unaware of the details of their financial situation. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the spouse to conceal possessions. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve services and expert practices where it is relatively simple to hide properties and income. In addition, the issue of evaluation can be rather contentious.

So … as a general rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your other half is hiding assets/income.
  • Your husband is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most typical. These days, most of divorcing couples select the “traditional” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, though, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to popular belief, divorce normally does not include two individuals equally agreeing to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both methods depend on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged situation, the chances are really high that partnership or mediation may stop working. Why take the threat of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are coming to an agreement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for the length of time). You desire your lawyer to be a highly competent arbitrator, you don’t desire someone who is overly combative, ready to fight over anything and everything. An excessively contentious technique will not only prolong the discomfort and significantly increase your legal costs, it will also be emotionally destructive to everybody involved, especially the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always aim to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. But if they can’t concern an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to solve these concerns.

Up up until that point both lawyers were “arbitrators,” attempting to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some reasonable resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each lawyer modifications.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big danger for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the danger of going to court is generally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is great to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links