Family mediation

During mediation an independent, professionally trained arbitrator helps you and your ex-partner exercise a contract about issues such as:

arrangements for kids after you break up (in some cases called home or contact);.

  • kid maintenance payments.
  • financial resources (for instance, what to do with your house, cost savings, pension, debts)

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, therefore it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s pondering divorce, you have a number of choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to think about four broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very made complex, both legally and financially. You can easily make mistakes, and frequently those errors are irreparable. The only situation I can envision when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved quite quickly and cheaply. Nevertheless, I would still highly suggest that each celebration have their own separate lawyer review the last files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to seek advice from with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to think about before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be much easier on children given that the divorce proceedings may be more peaceful.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Lose time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your hubby, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s uneven or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific properties. Given that all monetary information is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your husband might possibly hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My most significant problem with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any agreement! Unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is generally not a viable option for a lot of females.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collective divorce happens when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your partner will each employ a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather different than in a traditional divorce. Each attorney encourages and helps their customer in working out a settlement contract. You will meet your attorney separately and you and your lawyer will likewise meet with your partner and his lawyer. The collaborative procedure may also include other neutral professionals such as a divorce monetary organizer who will help both of you work through your financial issues and a coach or therapist who can assist direct both of you through child custody and other emotionally charged concerns.

In the collective procedure, you, your husband and your particular attorneys all should sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your husband should start all over once again and find new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process achieves success, you will normally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than traditional litigation if the collective process works.

However, I have discovered that the collective technique frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complicated monetary situations or when there are considerable assets. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary details (income, possessions and liabilities) is revealed willingly. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve businesses and professional practices where it is relatively easy to hide possessions and income.

So … as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your spouse is domineering, and you have problem speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most typical. Nowadays, most of separating couples pick the “traditional” design of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “prosecuted” does not indicate the divorce ends up in court. The large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the opportunities are really high that collaboration or mediation may stop working. Why take the risk of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most crucial and most tough parts of any divorce are concerning a contract on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). You want your lawyer to be a highly proficient arbitrator, you do not desire somebody who is extremely combative, all set to fight over anything and whatever. An overly contentious approach will not only extend the discomfort and considerably increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally destructive to everyone involved, particularly the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will always aim to come to an affordable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to fix these concerns.

If you have tried everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and pertain to some sensible resolution. But once in court, the role of each attorney changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– which’s also why the threat of litigating is usually such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Obviously, if you are able to work with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are sincere and reasonable, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. But, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Fallback” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links