Family mediation

Throughout mediation an independent, expertly experienced mediator assists you and your ex-partner work out an arrangement about issues such as:

arrangements for children after you break up (sometimes called house or contact);.

  • kid maintenance payments.
  • finances (for example, what to do with your home, cost savings, pension, financial obligations)

Arrange a Call Back

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s considering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider four broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only situation I can imagine when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just 2 or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, specific attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be easier on children considering that the divorce procedures might be more serene.
  • Expedite an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or biased towards your other half, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or improperly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal problems. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain possessions. Since all monetary details is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable behavior of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any contract! Remember, the arbitrator can not provide any advice. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Regrettably, not all agreements are excellent arrangements, and in fact, in many cases, no contract is much better than a bad arrangement. So unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a feasible option for most ladies.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collective divorce takes place when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collective divorce both you and your hubby will each work with an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite various than in a standard divorce. Each attorney recommends and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement agreement. You will consult with your lawyer individually and you and your lawyer will also meet with your partner and his lawyer. The collaborative procedure might also include other neutral experts such as a divorce monetary coordinator who will assist both of you resolve your financial issues and a coach or therapist who can help direct both of you through kid custody and other emotionally charged problems.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your husband and your particular lawyers all need to sign a contract that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your partner must start all over again and find new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less pricey than conventional litigation if the collective procedure works.

Though, I have discovered that the collective approach typically does not work well to settle divorces including complicated financial scenarios or when there are significant assets. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (income, assets and liabilities) is revealed willingly. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve organizations and expert practices where it is relatively simple to hide assets and earnings.

So … as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your other half is concealing assets/income.
  • Your spouse is domineering, and you have trouble speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, most of separating couples choose the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. The large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged situation, the chances are very high that partnership or mediation may stop working. Why take the threat of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most crucial and most hard parts of any divorce are coming to an arrangement on kid custody, division of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely competent negotiator, you do not desire somebody who is overly combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An overly controversial approach will not only extend the discomfort and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally harmful to everybody included, especially the children.

Keep in mind: Most divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will constantly strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to deal with these issues.

If you have actually attempted everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up till that point both attorneys were “mediators,” trying to get the parties to compromise and concern some sensible resolution. But once in court, the function of each lawyer modifications. Negotiations and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their client.

And don’t forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both celebrations to take– which’s likewise why the risk of litigating is generally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Obviously, if you have the ability to deal with your husband to make decisions and both of you are sincere and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative method might be best. But, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Fallback” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links