Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, especially those divorcing or separating. Whatever the issues, our knowledge will help you settle them

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s pondering divorce, you have a number of options about how to continue. In general terms, you require to consider 4 broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best recommendations I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both legally and financially. You can easily make errors, and typically those errors are irreparable. The only situation I can picture when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite quickly and cheaply. However, I would still extremely recommend that each party have their own separate lawyer evaluation the final documents.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a separating couple deals with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. The arbitrator may or may not be a legal representative, but he/she should be extremely skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is important for the mediator to be neutral and not advocate for either celebration. Both celebrations still need to speak with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of pros and cons to consider prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on children given that the divorce proceedings may be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your spouse, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain properties. Considering that all monetary info is voluntarily disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby might potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable behavior of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any agreement! Unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is typically not a feasible option for many ladies.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce happens when a couple accepts exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your other half will each hire a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather various than in a standard divorce. Each attorney recommends and helps their client in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet with your attorney independently and you and your lawyer will also meet your spouse and his attorney. The collaborative procedure might likewise include other neutral experts such as a divorce financial planner who will help both of you resolve your financial issues and a coach or therapist who can help direct both of you through child custody and other mentally charged concerns.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your husband and your respective lawyers all need to sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your husband need to begin all over once again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collective procedure succeeds, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. But the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than conventional litigation if the collaborative procedure works.

Regrettably, though, I have found that the collective method often doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complicated monetary scenarios or when there are substantial properties. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial info (income, assets and liabilities) is revealed voluntarily. Frequently the husband manages the “bag strings,” and the partner is typically uninformed of the information of their monetary situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to hide properties. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve organizations and expert practices where it is fairly easy to hide possessions and earnings. Additionally, the concern of valuation can be quite contentious.

… as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your partner is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples select the “conventional” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a suit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, considering that both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the possibilities are really high that cooperation or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those paths when odds are they might fail, squandering your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to an agreement on kid custody, department of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). You desire your attorney to be a highly proficient arbitrator, you don’t want somebody who is overly combative, ready to fight over anything and everything. An overly controversial approach will not only prolong the pain and substantially increase your legal charges, it will also be mentally harmful to everyone included, specifically the children.

Remember: Many divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would suggest) will constantly aim to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. But if they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other party is totally unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to resolve these problems.

If you have actually tried whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” trying to get the parties to jeopardize and pertain to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the function of each lawyer modifications. Settlements and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your home, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both celebrations to take– which’s also why the danger of going to court is usually such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Certainly, if you are able to deal with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are truthful and reasonable, then mediation or the collaborative method may be best. However, if you have doubts, it is great to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links