FINANCIAL RESOURCES. FAMILY. FUTURE.

Solent Family Mediation assist families in conflict, specifically those separating or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more cost-efficient than heading to court. It lowers dispute, and your family stays in control of arrangements over children, property and finance.

We work right across England and Wales and our family mediation service has more than 30 years’ experience offering expert, professional family mediation services.

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to think about four broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best recommendations I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can visualize when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be achieved quite rapidly and cheaply.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both parties come to an arrangement on all aspects of their divorce. Both parties still need to consult with their own, private attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children since the divorce procedures might be more serene.
  • Speed up a contract.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lose time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your hubby, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific properties. Given that all financial info is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase negative habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My biggest problem with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the arbitrator is to get the parties to come to an agreement– any agreement! Keep in mind, the arbitrator can not provide any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Regrettably, not all contracts are good arrangements, and in fact, in most cases, no contract is better than a bad contract. So unless both parties can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I think that mediation is normally not a viable alternative for the majority of women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce takes place when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your partner will each work with a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your spouse and your respective lawyers all need to sign a contract that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your spouse should begin all over once again and discover brand-new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the very same lawyers again!

Even if the collaborative procedure achieves success, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less costly than standard lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have actually discovered that the collaborative approach frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated financial scenarios or when there are substantial assets. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, properties and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Typically the other half manages the “purse strings,” and the partner is typically uninformed of the information of their monetary circumstance. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to conceal properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve companies and professional practices where it is fairly easy to hide possessions and income. In addition, the concern of assessment can be quite controversial.

… as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your other half is hiding assets/income.
  • Your hubby is domineering, and you have problem speaking out or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “traditional” design of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Because contrary to popular belief, divorce typically does not involve 2 people mutually agreeing to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both techniques depend on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the chances are extremely high that cooperation or mediation may fail. Why take the danger of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most important and most tough parts of any divorce are pertaining to an arrangement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for how long). Although you want your attorney to be an extremely proficient arbitrator, you don’t want someone who is excessively combative, prepared to combat over anything and whatever. An excessively contentious approach will not just lengthen the pain and considerably increase your legal costs, it will also be mentally harmful to everyone involved, specifically the children.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. But if they can’t concern a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is entirely unreasonable then, regrettably, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to fix these problems.

If you have actually attempted whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and pertain to some affordable resolution. But once in court, the function of each lawyer modifications. Settlements and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the best possible result for their customer.

And do not forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both parties to take– and that’s also why the hazard of going to court is usually such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is great to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links