Solent Family Mediation assist families in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating. Whatever the concerns, our proficiency will help you settle them

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best suggestions I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both lawfully and economically. You can easily make errors, and frequently those errors are irreversible. The only situation I can imagine when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved quite quickly and inexpensively. Nevertheless, I would still extremely recommend that each party have their own different attorney evaluation the last files.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral mediator who helps both celebrations come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to seek advice from with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be easier on kids given that the divorce proceedings may be more serene.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might likewise:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the conciliator is inexperienced or biased towards your partner, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s uneven or badly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal issues. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular properties. Given that all monetary info is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is usually not a practical choice for the majority of women.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collective divorce takes place when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collective divorce both you and your hubby will each work with a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather different than in a conventional divorce. Each lawyer advises and assists their client in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet your lawyer independently and you and your lawyer will also consult with your other half and his lawyer. The collective process might likewise involve other neutral professionals such as a divorce monetary organizer who will assist both of you work through your monetary concerns and a coach or therapist who can assist guide both of you through child custody and other mentally charged concerns.

In the collective procedure, you, your other half and your respective lawyers all need to sign an agreement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your partner should start all over once again and find brand-new attorneys. Neither party can use the same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective procedure is successful, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal process can be much quicker and less costly than traditional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have discovered that the collaborative method typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial circumstances or when there are considerable properties. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is revealed voluntarily. Frequently the partner manages the “bag strings,” and the better half is usually uninformed of the details of their monetary circumstance. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the partner to hide possessions. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces include organizations and expert practices where it is reasonably easy to hide properties and earnings. Additionally, the problem of assessment can be rather controversial.

So … as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your other half is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is prideful, and you have difficulty speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most common. These days, most of divorcing couples select the “conventional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. The huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Because contrary to common belief, divorce generally does not involve two people equally accepting end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial scenario right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both methods count on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the chances are extremely high that cooperation or mediation may stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most essential and most hard parts of any divorce are coming to an agreement on kid custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for the length of time). You desire your lawyer to be a highly skilled negotiator, you don’t want someone who is extremely combative, prepared to battle over anything and everything. An extremely controversial technique will not only extend the pain and significantly increase your legal charges, it will also be emotionally damaging to everybody included, particularly the children.

Keep in mind: Many divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will always strive to come to an affordable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these issues.

If you have actually tried everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up till that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and pertain to some reasonable resolution. When in court, the role of each lawyer changes. Negotiations and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their new job is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big danger for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the hazard of going to court is normally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. If you have doubts, it is great to be ready with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links