FINANCIAL RESOURCES. HOUSEHOLD. FUTURE.

Solent Family Mediation assist families in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more cost-effective than heading to court. It reduces dispute, and your household remains in control of arrangements over kids, residential or commercial property and finance.

We work right across England and Wales and our family mediation service has over thirty years’ experience offering expert, professional family mediation services.

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have several alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really complicated, both lawfully and economically. You can quickly make errors, and typically those mistakes are irreversible. The only scenario I can visualize when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished rather quickly and inexpensively. I would still extremely recommend that each celebration have their own different lawyer review the last files.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both parties come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still need to consult with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids because the divorce procedures might be more peaceful.
  • Expedite an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lose time and cash. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your spouse, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover specific possessions. Considering that all monetary details is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your husband could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative habits of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any agreement! Remember, the arbitrator can not offer any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Not all contracts are good agreements, and in reality, in numerous cases, no agreement is much better than a bad arrangement. So unless both celebrations can be fairly reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a practical choice for the majority of women.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your other half will each hire an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is rather different than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your partner and your particular attorneys all must sign an arrangement that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your husband must begin all over once again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative process achieves success, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. But the legal process can be much quicker and more economical than standard lawsuits if the collective procedure works.

However, I have discovered that the collaborative technique frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated financial circumstances or when there are substantial possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Often the husband manages the “purse strings,” and the other half is typically uninformed of the details of their monetary situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the husband to hide possessions. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces include businesses and professional practices where it is relatively easy to hide assets and income. Furthermore, the concern of appraisal can be rather controversial.

So … as a general guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your other half is hiding assets/income.
  • Your hubby is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most common. Nowadays, most of separating couples choose the “traditional” model of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Because contrary to popular belief, divorce generally does not include 2 people equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial circumstance right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged scenario, the opportunities are extremely high that partnership or mediation may fail. Why take the threat of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most crucial and most challenging parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on kid custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for for how long). Although you desire your lawyer to be an extremely experienced arbitrator, you do not desire someone who is overly combative, prepared to fight over anything and whatever. An overly controversial approach will not just extend the pain and considerably increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally harmful to everybody involved, specifically the kids.

Keep in mind: The majority of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will constantly make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. But if they can’t concern a reasonable settlement or if the other party is totally unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to fix these issues.

If you have actually tried everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and pertain to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the function of each lawyer modifications. Negotiations and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And do not forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both parties to take– which’s also why the hazard of going to court is usually such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links