If you are at the point of separation, or you are already separated or divorced, mediation may assist you concentrate on the future.

Arrange a Call Back

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, therefore it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have several choices about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about 4 broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can imagine when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved rather quickly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both celebrations come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still need to consult with their own, specific attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be simpler on children because the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your hubby, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal complications. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Because all financial info is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase unfavorable behavior of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Remember, the conciliator can not provide any advice. All they can do is attempt to get you to concur. Unfortunately, not all arrangements are good agreements, and in fact, in most cases, no agreement is much better than a bad agreement. So unless both parties can be fairly reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a viable option for the majority of females.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your other half will each hire a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite different than in a traditional divorce. Each attorney encourages and helps their client in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet your lawyer separately and you and your lawyer will likewise meet with your husband and his lawyer. The collective process may likewise involve other neutral experts such as a divorce financial organizer who will help both of you resolve your financial concerns and a coach or therapist who can help assist both of you through child custody and other emotionally charged problems.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular lawyers all should sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner should begin all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can use the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective procedure achieves success, you will normally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than traditional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have actually discovered that the collective approach typically doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial circumstances or when there are considerable assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial information (income, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve services and professional practices where it is fairly easy to conceal possessions and earnings.

So … as a general guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your other half is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is domineering, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. Nowadays, most of separating couples select the “standard” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “litigated” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial circumstance right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the possibilities are really high that partnership or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, wasting your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to an agreement on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you want your lawyer to be a highly knowledgeable arbitrator, you do not want somebody who is extremely combative, ready to combat over anything and everything. An extremely controversial technique will not just prolong the pain and considerably increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally detrimental to everybody included, particularly the children.

Keep in mind: The majority of divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would advise) will always aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to resolve these concerns.

Up up until that point both attorneys were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the role of each attorney modifications.

And don’t forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big danger for both parties to take– which’s also why the hazard of going to court is typically such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is great to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links