Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, specifically those divorcing or separating. Whatever the issues, our knowledge will help you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both lawfully and financially. You can quickly make mistakes, and frequently those errors are irreparable. The only circumstance I can imagine when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite quickly and inexpensively. I would still extremely advise that each party have their own separate lawyer review the final files.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple deals with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations concern an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. The arbitrator might or may not be a lawyer, however he/she should be very fluent in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the conciliator to be neutral and not promote for either party. Both parties still need to speak with their own, private lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids given that the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Speed up a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might likewise:

  • Waste time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or biased towards your spouse, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal complications. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover specific properties. Since all monetary details is voluntarily disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner might possibly hide assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase negative habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Unless both celebrations can be relatively sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a viable choice for a lot of females.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collective divorce happens when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each employ an attorney who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite different than in a standard divorce.

In the collective process, you, your spouse and your particular lawyers all should sign a contract that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your partner need to begin all over once again and find new lawyers. Neither celebration can utilize the same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will normally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. The legal process can be much quicker and less pricey than standard litigation if the collective procedure works.

However, I have actually found that the collective approach frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex monetary situations or when there are considerable properties. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (income, assets and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Typically the husband manages the “purse strings,” and the wife is typically unaware of the information of their monetary situation. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the partner to conceal possessions. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include companies and professional practices where it is reasonably simple to hide possessions and income. Additionally, the problem of evaluation can be quite controversial.

… as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your partner is concealing assets/income.
  • Your husband is prideful, and you have problem speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most common. Nowadays, most of separating couples select the “traditional” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. The huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the chances are very high that collaboration or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those routes when odds are they might fail, losing your money and time?

The most crucial and most tough parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for the length of time). You desire your lawyer to be a highly knowledgeable negotiator, you do not desire someone who is extremely combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An excessively contentious approach will not just lengthen the discomfort and substantially increase your legal costs, it will also be emotionally damaging to everyone involved, particularly the children.

Remember: The majority of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will constantly aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to deal with these issues.

Up until that point both attorneys were “mediators,” trying to get the parties to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. When in court, the function of each attorney modifications.

And do not forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both celebrations to take– and that’s also why the hazard of litigating is normally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is great to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links