Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, particularly those separating or separating. Whatever the issues, our expertise will help you settle them

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous options about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to consider 4 broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely complicated, both legally and financially. You can easily make errors, and typically those mistakes are permanent. The only scenario I can visualize when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished quite quickly and inexpensively. I would still extremely recommend that each party have their own different lawyer review the final files.

Mediation

In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still require to consult with their own, specific attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children since the divorce procedures may be more tranquil.
  • Speed up a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the conciliator is inexperienced or biased towards your husband, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal issues. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain assets. Considering that all financial details is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any contract! Remember, the mediator can not provide any recommendations. All they can do is attempt to get you to agree. Not all arrangements are good agreements, and in fact, in numerous cases, no contract is better than a bad arrangement. Unless both celebrations can be relatively sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is usually not a feasible alternative for most females.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce happens when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your partner will each hire an attorney who has been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your hubby and your respective attorneys all must sign an arrangement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your other half need to start all over again and discover new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the very same lawyers again!

Even if the collaborative procedure is successful, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than conventional litigation if the collective procedure works.

Though, I have found that the collective approach often doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complicated financial scenarios or when there are substantial properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (income, assets and liabilities) is divulged willingly. Frequently the other half controls the “purse strings,” and the other half is generally uninformed of the details of their monetary situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the partner to hide possessions. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include companies and expert practices where it is reasonably easy to hide properties and earnings. In addition, the problem of assessment can be quite contentious.

… as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is prideful, and you have problem speaking out or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. These days, most of separating couples choose the “traditional” design of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a claim.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Since contrary to popular belief, divorce generally does not involve two individuals equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly mentally charged situation, the possibilities are very high that collaboration or mediation may stop working. Why take the danger of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most essential and most difficult parts of any divorce are coming to an agreement on kid custody, department of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for for how long). Although you want your attorney to be an extremely experienced negotiator, you don’t want someone who is extremely combative, prepared to fight over anything and everything. An extremely controversial approach will not only prolong the discomfort and considerably increase your legal costs, it will also be emotionally destructive to everyone involved, especially the children.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will always aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other celebration. However if they can’t pertain to an affordable settlement or if the other party is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these issues.

Up up until that point both lawyers were “arbitrators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each attorney modifications.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– which’s likewise why the danger of litigating is generally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce options carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Obviously, if you have the ability to work with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are sincere and reasonable, then mediation or the collective method may be best. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

Related Articles
Solent Family Mediation Important Links